 |
| Poll |
 |
 |
| Should Kaveri engine project be scrapped ?? |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
N&S America : Iran Could Strike U.S. by 2015, U.S. Officials Say |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Author: idrw team | 4 October 2007 | Views: 489 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
BY : FOXNEWS
Iranian technology is on pace to build a long-range missile that could strike the United States within a decade, a high-level Pentagon official told FOX News.
But a successful test of a missile defense program completed last week is giving military leaders more confidence that an airborne attack from Iran can be thwarted — if the United States is able to convince Europe to go along with the plans to build an anti-missile system there against strong Russian opposition.
"Most of the intelligence experts predict that sometime before 2015, or in that time frame, the Iranians will have developed the capabilities to threaten the United States, from a missile technology perspective, "Lt. Gen. Henry Obering, chief of the U.S. missile defense program, said Tuesday in a Pentagon interview with FOX News. Of concern Obering said is Iran's ability to take shorter range technology and improving it to longer and longer ranges.
Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said Wednesday the U.S. was in no position to start a war against Iran given its military commitment in Iraq.
Growing international political tension with Iran over its nuclear program and its role in orchestrating insurgent attacks in Iraq has given military officials here reason to step up their efforts in developing a workable missile defense system.
Right now, the administration is working on a plan to build a missile defense system to protect against Iranian weapons in friendly host countries in Europe. But those plans have been loudly criticized by Russia — which thinks the system could be used to attack their own missiles
Additionally, U.S. lawmakers have stripped $85 million from the program in their consideration of the Defense Authorization bill. Prior to its passage in the Senate Monday, lawmakers said there should be an approval from the host countries, including Poland and the Czech Republic, before that money slated for construction is authorized.
But last week's successful interceptor missile system test conducted by the U.S. Missile Defense Agency off the coast of California gave the program a needed shot of confidence. The system was designed to simulate an attack from North Korea or possibly Iran.
"It was a picture perfect intercept," Obering said. Since 2001, six out of nine test flights have been successful and three have failed. Obering said there has not been a failed intercept test in 2 1/2 years. Last year, a test did not come to completion when the test missile failed to launch properly.
The interceptor missile was fired from Alaska, flying for 24 minutes before being struck by the interceptor missile, which was fired from Vandenburg Air Base in California, and flew seven minutes. The two missiles collided over open ocean, smashing to pieces miles above.
The program has its roots in the 1980s Strategic Defense Initiative — dubbed the "Star Wars" program — started in the Reagan administration. Since 1983 it has cost $100 billion. Despite the money stripped out, the 2008 Defense Authorization bill included $8.6 billion for the program.
This missile defense system in California and Alaska is designed to protect against North Korean missiles fired from Asia. It is similar to the system that the US would like to place in Europe to protect against Iranian missiles.
The European system, Obering said, would be created specifically to intercept Iranian missiles. Obering strongly denied the Russian charge — that it could be used against them — saying the system would be too close to Russia launch points to be effective.
"The system we are fielding has nothing to do with Russia," Obering said today.
The acrimony between Americans and Russians over the antimissile system comes as Russia has been sending bomber flights over U.S. and European interests, including new reports of their bombers flying just outside U.S. airspace in Alaska seven times since July 1.
For its part, Iran isn't officially fazed by U.S. plans to defend against any missiles. In June, Iran's top nuclear negotiator called the plan "the joke of the year." |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Dear Visitor You have Not Logged In Please Register And Then Login.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
Russia 'could answer U.S. shield with orbital ballistic missiles'U.S. gets a first look at Russian radarCan the Arrow thwart Iran's Shihab 3?Iran says still negotiating purchase of Russia's S-300 systemsRussia test-fires new intercontinental missile |
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| | Registered: 30 August 2007 | ICQ: -- |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
 |
how british haramis have infiltrated evrey where.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carroll_Quigley
Carroll Quigley From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
quote "Writings on the Anglo-American elite
Quigley became well known among those who believe that there is an international conspiracy to bring about a one-world government. In his 1966 book, Tragedy and Hope, he based his analysis on his extensive research in the closely-held papers of an Anglo-American elite organization,[citation needed] to which he was given access.[citation needed] According to Quigley, the U.S. and UK governments were secretly controlled through a series of Round Table Groups, the group in the U.S. being the Council on Foreign Relations.[citation needed] He contended that both the Republican and Democratic parties were controlled by an "international Anglophile network" that shaped elections.
The Anglo-American Establishment was not published until 1982, five years after Quigley's death, because of its controversial material:[citation needed] several publishers would not publish it when it was written in 1949, but the manuscript was found after his death on the Island of Rhodes.[citation needed]
The book argues that the real motive of Neville Chamberlain's appeasement of Adolf Hitler was to instigate a war between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union; by deliberately encouraging and assisting in Germany's efforts to expand in the east so that Germany could have a common frontier with the Soviet Union.
He also claimed that Alfred Milner was the chief author of the the Balfour Declaration of 1917.
Critics assailed Quigley for his approval of the goals (though not the tactics) of the Anglo-American elite, while selectively using his information and analysis as evidence for their views.[citation needed] "" |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| | Registered: 30 August 2007 | ICQ: -- |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
 |
ITIS SHAME THAT THIS PROPAGANDA MENTIONS 2015. I WOULD HAVE WANTED IRAN TO BE ABLE TO HIT AND KI8LL ALL THE AMERICANS AND ENGLISH RACE now! this anglosaxon race msut be killed to save the world and ofocurse you need to kill their spies like man mohan singh too.
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=10&ItemID=14022
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=10&ItemID=14022
Corporations like Boeing, Raytheon, Halliburton, Lockheed Martin, Exxon, General Dynamics, General Electric really are great “tyrannical terrorists” who regularly destroy lives and livable ecology (as with global warming), undermine democracy, generate poverty and concentrate wealth and power at home and abroad.
The broad populace of the West really is largely enslaved to the cancerous and authoritarian nightmare that is the profit-addicted, privileged-serving, human and environment-assaulting capitalist system.
And that system really is “turn[ing] the entire world into a fiefdom of the major corporations under the label of ‘globalization’ in order to protect democracy.”
All of that and much more is all too tragically true, sad to say – something that is well understood by much if not most of the morally and politically cognizant human race. And for what it’s worth, that understanding is deeply consistent with the world’s leading religious traditions (Islam included), all of which have always contained strong ethical objections to the savage wealth/class inequality, economic exploitation and narcissistic commercialism that lay at the dark heart of the deadly bourgeois mode of production, exchange, governance, and “life.” |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| | Registered: 30 August 2007 | ICQ: -- |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
 |
as true of india as for russia=both have common enemies,
as true for india as for russia-both have common enemies.
http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2007/interviews/3424rpmonitor.html
http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2007/interviews/3424rpmonitor.html
quote--"
This interview appears in the June 15, 2007 issue of Executive Intelligence Review. LAROUCHE TO RUSSIAN JOURNAL `The Enemy of Russia Is London'
In an interview given May 16, 2007 in Moscow to Andrei Kobyakov, director of the Russian web publication RPMonitor (www.rpmonitor.ru), Lyndon LaRouche addressed the British roots and control of current provocations against Russia in Europe. The excerpts provided here were transcribed by EIR from the audio tape and are pre-published with permission of RPMonitor.
LaRouche: The enemy was Britain in 1945-46; the enemy of Russia is Britain today. It's not the United States, it's Britain. It's London, what it represents as a financial clique center of the world. Since 1971-72, the British have taken control, politically, of the dollar. The dollar is a reserve currency that controls the world's fate today, but it's actually controlled from London. And the question is, to get the dollar back out of the hands of London and to reorganize the world financial system.
So, we must defeat London now, or there's no chance for the future....
I think senior people in Russia do not think that the United States is the problem. They think that the United States is key to the problem, but that Britain is the enemy. Anyone who understands this knows that Britain is the enemy. The British Empire. |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|