Make HomePage BookMark Us
 
Login
Name :  
Passwrd :  
   
   
Register Now!
Forgot Your Pass?
www.idrw.org / Indian Defense Research Wing » N&S America » Lockheed waits to put F-35 to the test again
Menu
India Europe
Asia&Pacific N&S America
Africa Contact Us
Exclusive RSS 2.0
 
Advanced Search
Calender
«    October 2007    »
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 
Latest News
» Indian Searchers Settle Next To Somalia
» Rafael to supply SPYDER SAM systems to India news
» Serial production of IDAS for India
» Pakistani warplanes flying close to border, govt source ...
» Final trials of Nag missiles from next week
» Ministries spar over Russia UAV sale
» India's Nag land version begins final user trials
» Tenders for six more submarines for Navy next year: Ant ...
» Russia to supply 80 helicopters to India within three y ...
» Indian military tests Smerch MLRS
Poll
Should Kaveri engine project be scrapped ??

Yes
NO
Go for a Joint venture on Kaveri
Go for a Joint venture on new Engine
Archives
January 2009 (16)
December 2008 (64)
November 2008 (55)
October 2008 (51)
September 2008 (53)
August 2008 (83)
July 2008 (82)
June 2008 (98)
May 2008 (79)
April 2008 (111)
March 2008 (65)
February 2008 (133)
January 2008 (103)
December 2007 (86)
November 2007 (82)
October 2007 (130)
September 2007 (122)
August 2007 (136)
July 2007 (102)
June 2007 (90)
May 2007 (135)
April 2007 (89)
Change Skin
Sponsors
{banner_amazon}
 
 

N&S America : Lockheed waits to put F-35 to the test again
 
BY: Star-Telegram

Five months have passed since flight testing of the first F-35 Lightning II was suspended after the discovery of a potentially dangerous electrical problem.

Lockheed Martin officials say they're confident that the plane will fly again this month and that the delay won't throw the nearly $300 billion joint strike fighter program off track.

But they're waiting to hear if Pentagon officials will approve a revised testing plan that aims to save hundreds of millions of dollars by eliminating two test airplanes and 20 percent of the planned test flights.

Dan Crowley, Lockheed's executive vice president of manufacturing and development for the F-35, says that test flights should resume soon and that he is confident of quickly making up lost time.

"It's taken a little longer to get back in the air than we'd hoped," Crowley said, but he added the downtime has been used to perform maintenance and upgrades on the aircraft and to install updated software.

Lockheed needs to demonstrate that it can maintain the F-35's development schedule and keep it on budget.

As the Iraq and Afghanistan wars continue, costing hundreds of billions of dollars and demanding much of the military's equipment, the Pentagon, the armed forces and Congress are all looking for added funds.

The F-35 is "in the mix for such a large amount of money that inevitably someone's going to look at it" as a source of funds for their program, said Loren Thompson, a defense industry consultant and chief operating officer of the Lexington Institute think tank.

After 18 nearly flawless test flights, the F-35 had a malfunction in an electrical control box that required an emergency, but smooth and safe, landing.

Engineers quickly pinpointed the problem, redesigned the electrical components and sent the new designs to the manufacturer. Lockheed hoped to have the plane back in the air by the end of August.

Crowley said that as Lockheed officials and engineers examined the aircraft, other potential problems were discovered and fixed.

After the hot landing, the wheels and tires were replaced, and the landing gear was removed, inspected, tested and reinstalled. Other maintenance was performed.

Getting the new parts redesigned and manufactured has taken time, and Lockheed is awaiting final technical and safety approvals from the government before resuming flight testing.

"There are just all sorts of common testing issues where you learn about your design," Crowley said. He said program officials are taking a "very conservative" approach to testing and will not allow other flights until they're sure the plane is ready.

The goal is to complete a minimum of 17 more flight tests over North Texas, preferably by year's end. Once those are accomplished, the test airplane will be flown to Edwards Air Force Base in California for a month or more of testing.

During the test delay, Crowley said, the aircraft's aerial refueling system was checked out, tested and certified ready for use.

As critics in and out of the government warned repeatedly, the F-35 was launched in late 2001 with a very ambitious timetable and budget. Within two years, weight and other technical problems surfaced. The government delayed the program by a year, redesigned all but the first aircraft and added billions to the program's budget.

Not unexpectedly, other technical problems have arisen along the way, requiring Lockheed and its contractors to spend the $24 billion development budget faster than planned.

Engine contractor Pratt & Whitney has also run into technical problems on its end.

Rather than ask the Pentagon and Congress for more money, Lockheed and program officials have looked for savings internally and proposed a major overhaul of the test program. The plan calls for building two fewer test airplanes and trimming 1,400 test flights.

The revised plan was approved by the Pentagon office overseeing the program, headed by Air Force Gen. Charles Davis, and sent to John Young, acting undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics.

A Pentagon official said the revised testing plan was "under discussion" by Young's office.

Crowley says Lockheed and the other contractors are confident that they have learned enough about the F-35 in the early tests so they can cut the number of test aircraft from 15 to 13, reduce the number of flights and still perform all the required testing successfully.

"We're much smarter midway in the program about the jet, how we use and how we plan to test it," he said.

The initial test aircraft has proven so reliable that Lockheed believes that it can conduct more tests per flight than is typical in military aircraft programs.

The two jets to be cut are mission systems planes, testing all the systems aboard the aircraft. Crowley said those tests can be replicated in the ground laboratory at Lockheed, on the CATB flying test airplane, a heavily modified 737, or, if necessary, with other F-35 test aircraft.

The goal is "to live within the resources we have," he said, without having to ask Congress for more money.

"If you're going to do that, you need to make the test decisions before you spend the money on the jets."

Lockheed's experience with the F-22 Raptor and other military programs has shown that what worked in the labs often doesn't work well when installed in an aircraft operating in realistic conditions. It took years of additional testing, modifications and software rewriting to make the F-22's complex, computer-controlled electronics systems work as promised.

"The difference is the F-22 did not have the investment in the labs to test these systems that we have," Crowley said, adding the F-35 program is 10 years ahead in the development and testing of technology.

Work continues at the Lockheed plant on the second test aircraft, a short-takeoff-vertical-landing version of the F-35 that will encompass all of the redesign work undertaken to lower weight and improve the manufacturing process.

Crowley said the electrical systems on the aircraft should be turned on this month. A ceremonial rollout, at which senior Marine Corps and Pentagon leaders are expected, is scheduled for Dec. 18.

The second test aircraft is not scheduled to fly until May or June.
 
 
 
   
 
 
Dear Visitor You have Not Logged In Please Register And Then Login.
 
 
  • Lockheed Martin readies F-35B STOVL JSF for roll-out
  • Lockheed F-35 costs about unchanged over past year
  • Joint Strike Fighter's price tag going up, auditors say
  • Singapore and Israel eye buying Lockheed fighter
  • Tejas: ADA looks to Boeing to provide help
  •  
     
    Comments (2)  Print
     
     
    #1 Author: avatar_singh (12 October 2007 16:16)
     
    http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=10&ItemID=14022

    http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=10&ItemID=14022

    Corporations like Boeing, Raytheon, Halliburton, Lockheed Martin, Exxon, General Dynamics, General Electric really are great “tyrannical terrorists” who regularly destroy lives and livable ecology (as with global warming), undermine democracy, generate poverty and concentrate wealth and power at home and abroad.



    The broad populace of the West really is largely enslaved to the cancerous and authoritarian nightmare that is the profit-addicted, privileged-serving, human and environment-assaulting capitalist system.



    And that system really is “turn[ing] the entire world into a fiefdom of the major corporations under the label of ‘globalization’ in order to protect democracy.”



    All of that and much more is all too tragically true, sad to say – something that is well understood by much if not most of the morally and politically cognizant human race. And for what it’s worth, that understanding is deeply consistent with the world’s leading religious traditions (Islam included), all of which have always contained strong ethical objections to the savage wealth/class inequality, economic exploitation and narcissistic commercialism that lay at the dark heart of the deadly bourgeois mode of production, exchange, governance, and “life.”
     
     
    Quote    
     
     
    #2 Author: avatar_singh (14 October 2007 17:13)
     

    http://frontierindia.net/author/chackojoseph/

    http://frontierindia.net/author/chackojoseph/

    quote "No Ship is Unsinkable
    September 5, 2007 – 3:08 pm

    “On 10th of December, we received intelligence that the US 7th fleet was entering Bay of Bengal through the Malacca Straits.” Vice Admiral SH Sarma, PVSM (Retd) in his book “My Years at Sea.”
     
     
    Quote    
     
     
    Add comments
       
     

     

    Fair Use Notice This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material is being made available in an effort to advance understanding arms trade activities, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html This is a completely non-commercial site for private personal use. No fee is charged, and no money is made off of the operation of this site - we have limited ads to cover our operational cost we don't have a donation button neither we accept any. All material that is not produced by the individuals who use this site will be placed under the directory /fair-use or /media under this domain.