 |
| Poll |
 |
 |
| Should Kaveri engine project be scrapped ?? |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Asia&pacific : Are Fighter Jets The Latest Lethal Chinese Export? |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Author: idrw team | 31 October 2007 | Views: 947 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
BY : Forbes
Even as China continues to resist stronger international sanctions against Iran, it is reportedly planning to sell Iran an advanced fighter jet based on a model that Israel developed with U.S.-made components and taxpayer money.
Word of the deal first surfaced last week in the Russian media. According to those reports, China plans to sell 24 Chengdu Jian-10 (J-10) fighter jets to the Iran Aircraft Manufacturing Industrial Co. for $1 billion between 2008 and 2010. The J-10, unveiled by China this past January, has enough of a range to help conduct air strikes on Israel.
There's reason to take Russian reports seriously. "Some elements of the Russian press are very well informed and sometimes it's among the best because of the deep ties between the Chinese defense base and large Russian exporters," said James Mulvenon, director of the Center for Intelligence Research and Analysis and a specialist on the Chinese military.
Indeed, Russian industry would have a stake in the J-10 exports. Kremlin-friendly defense conglomerate Rosoboronexport recently signed a contract worth $150 million to deliver 50 aircraft engines to be installed on the Chinese J-10.
China has already sold Iran 43 older fighter jets and eight utility aircraft in exchange for oil. But the J-10--operationally competitive with the U.S. F-16 Falcon, developed by General Dynamics (nyse: GD - news - people ) and Lockheed Martin (nyse: LMT - news - people )--is more sophisticated and may suit as, say, the escort necessary to allow a missile-carrying warplane to reach targets in Israel.
The plane's 3200 kilometer range "is more than enough to get from Western Iran and Israel and back without refueling," observed Jon Wolfstahl, a senior fellow studying Iran and nonproliferation with the Center for Strategic and International Studies International Security Program. He hastened to add, however, that he wasn't commenting on whether such a mission would be successful, given Israel's superior air defense systems.
Chinese and Iranian officials have so far publicly denied a J-10 deal. But they generally haven't been open to scrutiny of their military hardware or plans. Notably, when Air Force Gen. Paul Hester became the first American military commander to visit the Jining Air Base in China this past summer, the Chinese army officials there refused to even show him the J-10 at the site.
Particularly galling to the Americans is the J-10's likely linage--U.S. taxpayers may have indirectly helped China develop it. The J-10 is considered by many military experts to be partially based on the defunct Israeli Lavi fighter jet platform, which itself was derived from the American F-16. The Lavi was intended to be the Jewish State's home grown, world-leading aircraft. At first the U.S. cooperated through joint research, $1.3 billion in foreign aid and the use of engines from Pratt & Whitney, a division of United Technologies (nyse: UTX - news - people ).
But the Reagan administration shifted course--it didn't want competition on the arms market--and exerted enough pressure on Israel to kill the program in the late ‘80s. Israel later shared some of the plans and research for the Lavi with China, according to military experts, reports in The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, and in Defense News, an industry trade journal.
"It's sort of an ironic twist, since the J-10 is controversial because it incorporates technology from the Israelis," noted Mulvenon. (No one has alleged Israel broke any laws or secrecy rules and there are varying theories as to why Israel might have shared its plans.)
Meanwhile, China is bulking up its own military, as well as its arm sales. China announced in March that it would increase its military budget by 17.8% in 2007 to $45 billion. But according to some Western analysts, that number doesn't include major weapons purchases and is vastly understated. The Heritage Foundation, a hawkish think tank in Washington, D.C., estimates China's actual military spending may exceed $400 billion a year. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Dear Visitor You have Not Logged In Please Register And Then Login.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
Israel-China linkIran to buy 24 J-10 jet fighters from ChinaIran looking to Russia, China to help modernize air forceChinese J-10 'benefited from the Lavi project'Russian Engines to Fly to Pakistan |
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| | Registered: 30 August 2007 | ICQ: -- |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
 |
http://www.larouchepac.com/news/2007/11/09/dollar-crash-shrapnel-reaches-india.html
http://www.larouchepac.com/news/2007/11/09/dollar-crash-shrapnel-reaches-india.html
Shrapnel from Dollar Crash Reaches India 09 Nov 2007
November 9, 2007 (LPAC)--Because India has adopted an export-based growth model since Y-2K, thus jeopardizing the future of millions of poor people in order to earn foreign exchange and GDP growth, the collapse of the US dollar has set loose a cat among the pigeons in India's new-growth sectors. According to Washington Post reporter Rama Lakshmi, 4 million poor Indians, who were living from hand to mouth by working in the cut-throat garment industry, have already lost their livelihood to the collapse of the dollar. His report indicates that another 4 million garment workers are on the chopping block.
In recent months, the Indian currency, the Rupee, gained significantly against the hapless dollar. On Jan. 1, the dollar was worth 46 Indian rupees, and now it is 39.
The collapse of the dollar has hit the poor in India two ways. First, the reduction of purchasing power of Americans, who were the sales target of Indian employers, has reduced demand for exports. Second, the higher valued rupee has made the "Made in India" garments more expensive than the garments of poorer nations-- such as Vietnam, for instance-- whose currency is linked fully to the dollar.
The 4 million newly unemployed in the garment industry, caused by the weakening dollar, represent at least twice as many workers as those employed by India's much-vaunted Information Technology sector. |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| | Registered: 30 August 2007 | ICQ: -- |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
 |
manmoahn singh msut be liilled immediately and so should be those traitors in the english media who are simply coolie and dogs of anglodsaxon masters and who want India sebeservient to americans. the real traitors must be killed no point in discussion with thse bastards as they are so corrupt that they knowingly sell india cheap to the foreiners angloamerican interests and then label others traitors. kill thse basatrds.
MANMOHAN SINGH MSUT BE KILLED NOW.AND SO SHOUDL THE TRAITORS IN iNDIA WHO WANT TO SELL INDIA CHEAP TO THE ANGLOAMERICAN INTERESTS AND THEN DARE CALL OTHERS TRAITORS.
may 25th, 2007. http://www.larouchepac.com/
LaRouche on Russian TV: "British Empire" Determined to have a war with Russia, China and India
May 25 (LPAC)--The impact of Lyndon LaRouche's visit to Moscow last week is still being felt, with repeat broadcasts of LaRouche's interview in Moscow May 16, to the economist Mikhail Khazin, host of the "A+ in Economics" weekly program on the Spas Channel, a satellite TV station linked with the Russian Orthodox Church. The interview first aired on Friday, May 18, and was repeated several times.
With "showdowns" looming between the Anglo-American-Euro bloc at the United Nations and Russia and China over Iran, and possibly over Kosovo, LaRouche identified the real war danger as coming from the British Empire--as he has described it--targeting Russia, China and India. LaRouche said:
======================================== =================
Russia., india and china, and many european countries aswell must pool their resources to defeat the angloamerican evil in the world. ""Khrushchev, of course, abused Bhutto and said should Pakistan look towards India or Afghanistan, the Soviets would take our eyes out. He (Bhutto) told Khrushchev not to get angry: Pakistan was ready to quit the pacts (South East Asia Treaty Organisation and Central Treaty Organisation)." -quote from zee news(april 21st ,2007) about ayub khan diary of 1960.
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| | Registered: 10 December 2008 | ICQ: 7456545 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|