http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=26596§ionid=351020602

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=30031§ionid=351020602


quote--"Moscow: West seeks to break up Russia
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:24:34
Russia's chief intelligence Nikolay Patrushev.
Russia's intelligence chief says Western spies are seeking to break up the country and singled out British agents as the most intrusive.

Nikolay Patrushev said highly trained British agents are putting their noses into Russian politics in a bid to influence the outcome of parliamentary and presidential elections.

There's been an alarming rise in British spying activity across the Russian Federation, he warned.

He added foreign spies were using non-governmental organizations "both for gathering intelligence information and as an instrument for having a hidden influence over political processes."

He pointed at the revolutions that ousted governments in the former Yugoslavia, Ukraine and Georgia as a product of such activities.
----"

ttp://www.larouchepac.com/news/2007/06/07/prince-bandar-named-multi-billion-dollar-bribe-scheme-britis.html

http://www.larouchepac.com/news/2007/06/07/prince-bandar-named-multi-billion-dollar-bribe-scheme-britis.html

Prince Bandar Named in Multi-Billion Dollar Bribe Scheme With British Defense Giant BAE
Increase Decrease

Prince Bandar Named in Multi-Billion Dollar Bribe Scheme With British Defense Giant BAE

June 7, 2007 (LPAC)--The longtime Saudi Arabian ambassador to the United States, who now is the head of national security for the Kingdom, received nearly $2 billion in bribes from a British arms manufacturer over a period of two decades. Prince Bandar bin-Sultan, who is also the son of the Saudi Minister of Defense, received payments into the Saudi Arabian embassy accounts in Washington at Riggs Bank, from BAE Systems, the British defense company that manufactures Tornado and Hawk jet fighters.

According to a BBC investigation, aired on June 6, the payments into the Saudi slush fund in Washington, D.C. were made beginning in 1985, when the Saudi government and BAE signed a $100 billion deal, under which the British company would provide fighter jets to the Kingdom, and would conduct other military-related construction projects. The payola scandal between BAE and Prince Bandar implicates every British government from Margaret Thatcher, through John Major and Tony Blair.

While the BAE-Saudi bribery scandal has been brewing for years, on Dec. 14, 2006, Lord Goldsmith, the British Attorney General, announced that the official probe, conducted by the Serious Crimes Office (SCO) would be ended, with no indictments. Prime Minister Blair fully endorsed the decision to shut down the probe, and both he and Lord Goldsmith claimed that any further action would jeopardize the national security of Great Britain. Washington sources who have been tracking the scandal for years reported to EIR that Prince Bandar had threatened the British government with a cutoff of all Saudi cooperation in the war on terrorism if the probe went any further.

Up through 2001, there were no laws in Great Britain against bribery---!!!

BA system must be banned from india-itis a n enemy organisation as far as india is concerend.


british are the number one enmy of india and of the rest of the world.


see this--


http://www.antiwar.com/orig/lohdi.php?articleid=12019

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/lohdi.php?articleid=12019

quote--"
December 8, 2007
Britain's Neo-Imperial Dreams in Afghanistan
by Bahlol Lohdi

Dean Acheson, the distinguished American statesman, famously opined in a speech at West Point in 1962, "that Great Britain has lost an empire and has not yet found a role." Forty years later, in 2002, Tony Blair and fellow dreamers thought the tragedy of 9/11 provided them with the opportunity once again to play a determining role on the world stage. The notion that Britain was to America as Greece had been to Rome – implying that Britain was going to be the "brain" and America the "brawn" – became a fashionable topic of discourse in the British media.

No matter how deluded this may have been when viewed objectively, Blair and his acolytes clung to the idea. They hoped to use the Anglo-American "special relationship" as the vehicle for achieving Britain's neo-imperial dreams.

However, the United States continued to view the relationship differently, and Blair's efforts to shape American policy through close ties to Washington failed, as has now been revealed by numerous retired senior British officials.

Nevertheless, still hoping to gain a place at the top table of decision making, and thereby try and shape future events, Blair committed Britain's forces to fight battles in two countries where Britain had a colonial past: Afghanistan and Iraq.

London thought that its colonial era experience in both countries would enable it to claim superior knowledge and expertise, thus giving British policy proposals inordinate weight, thereby influencing the political and economic shape of the post-conflict era in both countries to British advantage. However, this ambition has already been thwarted in Iraq and is at the point of being thwarted in Afghanistan.-------"