Where did this come from? Can you please tell us if this is a recent news or just recycled one? If its the latest news then our dealings with Russia are turning into a nightmare. Its time to ask some hard questions to our friend.

remember BONEY M song on RASPUTIN , who was known for his huge c*** and for laying russian women in his time! ra! ra! rasputin,russian like a love machine...may be wordings of the song not correct...But rasputin was good at seducing and scre**** women. The song ends up like this "Oh! those russians.!"

NO PROBLEM.
GO AND FIND THE SUBSTITUDE WITH NO CONDITIONALITIES AND NO ARM TWISTING AND FOR THE SAME LEVEL OF TECHNOLOGY.
RTUSSINAS MSUTR BE GETTING FED WITH NAGGING INDIANS (WHO CAN NEVER NAG TO AMERICA FOR SENDING SELLING ARMS TO PAKSITAN ).
PLEASE GO AND FIND THE LATERNATIVE.
RUSSIA DOES NTO NEED YOUR MONEY-RUSSIA ALREADY GAVE US ARMS IN THEN WORHTLESS RUPPESS TRADE -THAT WAS ALMOST FREE PURCHASE TO INDIA.
GOSROV AIRCRAFT CARRIER WAS ALSO GIVEN TO INDIA FREE FOR HULL-ONLY REAMRMENT WAS CHARGED FOR.
PLEASE LEAVE RUSSIA ALONE AND LOOK SOMEWHERE ELSE-RUSSIA CAN WELL SURVIVE WITHOUT INDIA -CAN INDIA REMAIN INDEPENET WITHOUT RUSSIAN HELP?
THOSE WHO WANT TO ENSLAVE INDIA DO THE PROPAGANDA AGASINT RUSSIA.

WHEN AMERICANS SELL WHOLE LOADS OF PLANES TO PAKSITAN AND THEN INDIANS PIMP FOR BUYING THE SAME PLANES FROM AMERICA -THEN WHY WOULD RUSSIA NOT PROFIT FROM SELLING PLANES TO PAKSITAN THREOUGH CHINA?-AFTERALL FOR DECADES RUSSIA NEVER SOLD TO PAKSITAN WHILE AMERICA HAS AWLAYS LOADED PKAISTAN AGASINT INDIA.
INIDA WILL SHOULD KNOW THE COST OF TAKING FRIENDS FOR GRANTED.
THE ONE REASON INDIANS EXPECT MORE FROM RUSSIAN IS SIMPLY BECAUSE RUSSIAN HAVE NOT KICKED INDIANS ARSE WHILE INDIANS LIEK TO RESPECT ONLY THOSE PEOPLE-BRIITSH AND AMERICANS WHO HAVE ABUSED THE INDIANS WHOLE THROUGH HISTORY AND KICK THEIR AASS ALL THE TIME-EVEN DENYING THEM SEAT IN un AS RECETNLY AS LAST YEAR.






this article,though for american establishment, suits very much the attitude (treacherous) of a RAT CALLED MANMOHAN SINGH WHO SHOUDL HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED LONG TIME AGO FROM OUR SCENCE FOR HAVING SOLD INDIA TO AMERICAN AGENDA WAY BACK 15YRS AGO-
a great misconception is that so caled liberalization and globalization was brought to india by this manmohan singh. In fact soon after victory in iraq war in febraury 1991 the bush no. first declared a new world order in which he explicitly said that he will open up the world for american business. In fact his trade seccratary immeditealy annomnuced that she will make sure that america open up the thighs of thrid world countries as a slwoly and surely to american business(true analogy to a rape)-that was given the name liberalization and globalization for which the british and americans had been working since 1986. What was left for america to do was install maleable stooges inside the thrirld world countries. escpeally those types who are unelctable and have no mass base of their own-- in other words who are not elelctable democratically but installed from above through media and other manipulations.
this manmohan singh in india fulffiled that criteria of being unliked and unelctable insignificant person who was willing to act on arder of his american masters

http://www.lewrockwell.com/higgs/higgs68.html

THIS ARTICLE FOR THOSE IDIOT INDIANS WHO THINK THAT TEHCNOCRAT OR MANAGERS SHOULD RUN THE COUNTRY. THEY KNOW BUT TRY TO HIDE THAT THE WHOLE ACTS OF THE TRAITORS LIKE MANMOHAN SINGH HAS BEEN A SOLE AGENDA OF BRINGING INDIA ON A PLATTER TO HIS ANGLOSAXON MASTERS.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/higgs/higgs68.html

so some indian pimps working for america are pushing for old kitty hwak-what bnext? thse bastards know that their mother have nio value otherwise they would have sold her as well.
#
BA system must be banned from india-itis a n enemy organisation as far as india is concerend.


british are the number one enmy of india and of the rest of the world.


see this--


http://www.antiwar.com/orig/lohdi.php?articleid=12019

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/lohdi.php?articleid=12019

quote--"
December 8, 2007
Britain's Neo-Imperial Dreams in Afghanistan
by Bahlol Lohdi

Dean Acheson, the distinguished American statesman, famously opined in a speech at West Point in 1962, "that Great Britain has lost an empire and has not yet found a role." Forty years later, in 2002, Tony Blair and fellow dreamers thought the tragedy of 9/11 provided them with the opportunity once again to play a determining role on the world stage. The notion that Britain was to America as Greece had been to Rome – implying that Britain was going to be the "brain" and America the "brawn" – became a fashionable topic of discourse in the British media.

No matter how deluded this may have been when viewed objectively, Blair and his acolytes clung to the idea. They hoped to use the Anglo-American "special relationship" as the vehicle for achieving Britain's neo-imperial dreams.

However, the United States continued to view the relationship differently, and Blair's efforts to shape American policy through close ties to Washington failed, as has now been revealed by numerous retired senior British officials.

Nevertheless, still hoping to gain a place at the top table of decision making, and thereby try and shape future events, Blair committed Britain's forces to fight battles in two countries where Britain had a colonial past: Afghanistan and Iraq.

London thought that its colonial era experience in both countries would enable it to claim superior knowledge and expertise, thus giving British policy proposals inordinate weight, thereby influencing the political and economic shape of the post-conflict era in both countries to British advantage. However, this ambition has already been thwarted in Iraq and is at the point of being thwarted in Afghanistan.-------"

go and get it from the anglosaxons parasites -whose agwents are swarming inside indian poiclitiacl and business class.
this is what the english race will do to you-you stupid inidans!

http://www.counterpunch.org/grosso01122008.html

Weekend Edition
January 12 / 13, 2008
A Special Relationship of Elites
The Anglosphere

By JOSEPH GROSSO

On October 28th 2007 the National Football League (NFL), the professional league of the most American of sports, granted the city of London the honor of hosting the first NFL game played in Europe. Before the game went on in rainy conditions before a disi

===============================

http://www.larouchepac.com/news/2008/01/13/eir-london-londons-brutish-fairy-tale.html

EIR on London: London's Brutish Fairy Tale
Increase Decrease

by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

Few people know that the 1929 "Great Depression" was an engineered event rigged by private central bankers out of London and NY. This was admitted to by no less than one of David Rockefeller's pet Chicago school economists Milton Friedman. Rockefeller also funded the London School of Economics as well as Harvard, etc, picking up where J.D. Rockefeller left off with the General Education Board to more or less fix the public debate.

In "Amerika" boom bust cycles and their crashed bubbles have always been about fiat funny money pumped out of a venal and very private "Federal Reseve" Corp created by and for corporate crime for corporate criminals (i.e. Fascism). By the way, the "Fed" was never federal and has zip for reserves. (Monopolists JD Rockefeller and Lord Rothschild through their various agents created the "Federal Reserve" Corp in 1913)

Fractional banking hooked into the "Fed" is a world-class con job that guarantees corruption, inflation, bubble-bust cycles and a military industrial Big Oil complex drunk on war as well as hijacking nations via CIA, World Bank, IMF, etc.

Naturally the whole mess is sold as "globalization" (another code word for Fascism as the merger of state corporate criminal power) where a parasite ruling class gets richer as the the rest of the "developed" and "developing" world falls behind.

Even Orwell couldn't have made this one up.

http://www.larouchepac.com/news/2008/01/14/does-china-and-india-nuclear-agreement-protect-indias-eight-.html

http://www.larouchepac.com/news/2008/01/14/does-china-and-india-nuclear-agreement-protect-indias-eight-.html

quote--"Does the China and India Nuclear Agreement Protect India's Right to the Thorium Cycle?
Increase Decrease

January 14, 2008 (LPAC)--Today the Prime Ministers of China and India agreed to "promote bilateral cooperation in civil nuclear energy," and welcomed the opportunity for scientists from both sides to work together in the ITER international fusion energy project.

Lyndon LaRouche commented that his primary concern is to protect India's ability to develop the full nuclear cycle, including, most importantly, the ability to develop the thorium cycle. The latter is especially necessary in light of the severe water and other crises in India and elsewhere, which cannot be solved without the use of thorium, which it is the intention of the U.S. and Britain to squelch.

Thus, LaRouche asked, does the agreement mean that China and Russia will protect India's right to the full nuclear cycle including thorium? If thorium is denied, then it is a dirty deal. India must be allowed to proceed independently with the thorium cycl----"

UK BAsystem is our enemy -why should india buy anything from thsoe corrupt enemies except when the prime minster and other pimps are in the pay of british and americvan interests?
read this article about corrupt anglosaxon haramis. and their agents inside india.


http://www.counterpunch.org/floyd02112008.html

http://www.counterpunch.org/floyd02112008.html
""
The Meaning of Mitt Romney's Exit Speech
American Psycho

By CHRIS FLOYD

If you would like to see just how sick the American elite really is--how morally depraved, how intellectually diseased, how addicted to the taste of human flesh, the scent of human blood, and the sight of human suffering--then y---"

quote---"The speech goes on and on in this way; reading it is like wading through the sewage pipe of an abattoir. China and India and other Asian nations pose a challenge that must be confronted and beaten down. Why? Because they may "pass us by as the economic superpower, just as we passed England and France during the last century." And we must stop the yellow devils, because "the prosperity and security of our children and grandchildren depend on us." Apparently, it is not possible for Asian nations and the United States to be secure and prosperous at the same time; "our children" can only prosper at the expense of others. This too is transparently ludicrous, even nonsensical, if taken literally. Of course, ordinary Asians and Americans could be prosperous at the same time. What Romney really means is that the American elite cannot exert dominance and gorge itself in the manner to which it has become accustomed if other nations are secure and prosperous in their own right."

itis high time that traitor manmohan singh be killed mericlessly now to relive india of such a pest who was alwasy a world bank employee and an american lackey put in PM office by angloamerican agetns to weaken india mortally.
if we want to save india we must kill this manmohan singh harami now

http://www.larouchepub.com/hzl/2008/3514brit_empire_tricks.html

British Empire Is Up
To Its Old Evil Tricks

by Helga Zepp LaRouche

Mrs. Zepp-LaRouche is the chairwoman of the Civil Rights Solidarity Movement (BüSo) in Germany. Her article has been translated from German.

While Bundesbank chairman Axel Weber, over Easter, was calling his colleague at the American Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke, and other central bank heads, hectically, but without result, in a desperate search for measures by which the meltdown of the financial system could somehow be brought under control, the financial oligarchy escalated its efforts to destabilize many regions of the world, and to strengthen its global control under a new version of the British Empire.

Before the reader rejects this short characterization of the situation in disbelief, with the argument—"But the British Empire doesn't exist any more!" he or she should recall that this is not the first time that old wine was proffered in new bottles. Many apparently separate developing daily events don't make the slightest sense, if you don't look at them in their strategic context. In the face of Orwellian control of the media, it is even more necessary, to judge contemporary developments with the eye of an historian, who has not forgotten the lessons of, for example, the 20th Century.

The economic strengthening of China, Russia, and India would lead, under normal circumstances, to the point that these countries, in five or ten years, would not only have world-power status, but also could pull past the Anglo-American-centered empire, in the economic sphere. It is absolutely understood in leading circles of these three nations, that it is the policy of the British Empire to, by all means, destroy the strategic partnership among Russia, China, and India—to separate them, in order to destroy each, one by one.

T

Just as the United States is seeking to get control over the Indian nuclear energy program through the proposed U.S.-Indian nuclear treaty, which has been fully rejected by India's Parliament and scientists, so Great Britain wants to extend control, through its special relationship with France at the just-concluded summit, over nuclear energy worldwide. Industry Minister John Hutton explained that Great Britain would take the lead in the development of nuclear energy globally,