Make HomePage BookMark Us
 
Login
Name :  
Passwrd :  
   
   
Register Now!
Forgot Your Pass?
www.idrw.org / Indian Defense Research Wing » India » Tech Transfers Nixed For MMRCA Offsets
Menu
India Europe
Asia&Pacific N&S America
Africa Contact Us
Exclusive RSS 2.0
 
Advanced Search
Calender
«    November 2007    »
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 
Latest News
» Indian Searchers Settle Next To Somalia
» Rafael to supply SPYDER SAM systems to India news
» Serial production of IDAS for India
» Pakistani warplanes flying close to border, govt source ...
» Final trials of Nag missiles from next week
» Ministries spar over Russia UAV sale
» India's Nag land version begins final user trials
» Tenders for six more submarines for Navy next year: Ant ...
» Russia to supply 80 helicopters to India within three y ...
» Indian military tests Smerch MLRS
Poll
Should Kaveri engine project be scrapped ??

Yes
NO
Go for a Joint venture on Kaveri
Go for a Joint venture on new Engine
Archives
January 2009 (16)
December 2008 (64)
November 2008 (55)
October 2008 (51)
September 2008 (53)
August 2008 (83)
July 2008 (82)
June 2008 (98)
May 2008 (79)
April 2008 (111)
March 2008 (65)
February 2008 (133)
January 2008 (103)
December 2007 (86)
November 2007 (82)
October 2007 (130)
September 2007 (122)
August 2007 (136)
July 2007 (102)
June 2007 (90)
May 2007 (135)
April 2007 (89)
Change Skin
Sponsors
{banner_amazon}
 
 

India : Tech Transfers Nixed For MMRCA Offsets
 
BY : VIVEK RAGHUVANSHI FOR Defensenews

Technology transfer will not count toward the offset requirement in bids for India’s $10 billion Medium Multirole Combat Aircraft (MMRCA), Indian Defence Ministry officials have decided.
Potential bidders learned of this new twist in an Oct. 30 meeting with ministry officials. The deadline for offset proposals has been extended until June, although technical bids are still due in March, a senior ministry official said.
The change will force bidders to recalculate their offers and increase the cost to the Indian Air Force, said one senior executive of a foreign aircraft firm. “The transfer of technology alone could add up to 60 percent of the total cost of the aircraft,” the executive said.
One exception: Ministry officials say dual-use technologies ones of value to defense and private aviation may be counted as offsets.
As well, India’s state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics, the lead production agency, has suggested that subsystems manufactured through a joint venture with a state-owned Indian defense firm be counted as offsets. Under Indian law, foreign arms suppliers that win contracts valued at more than $76 million must give Indian firms subcontract work worth 30 percent of the value.
Among the expected contenders are Russia’s MiG-35, Sweden’s JAS-39 Gripen, the French Rafale, Lockheed Martin’s F-16, Boeing’s F/A-18 Super Hornet and the Eurofighter Typhoon. The request for proposals went out in August.
Bidders must transfer technology in several areas, including airframes, engines, their accessories, radar, avionics, electronic-warfare equipment, other electronic subsystems, maintenance tools and equipment, ground support and handling equipment, and complete tooling to build aircraft, engines and accessories.
India also is looking for technologies such as thrust vectoring, weapon-control radar, mission computers and flight control computers, the executive said.
Permission to transfer this kind of technology will not be easy to get, he said, because the government in the country of origin has to give approval.
 
 
 
   
 
 
Dear Visitor You have Not Logged In Please Register And Then Login.
 
 
  • No MMRCA Bid Extension
  • India Aircraft Tech Proposal May Be Hard To Enforce, Ministry Says
  • India Exempts Some Arms Deals From Offsets
  • India Bid Request Questioned
  • L&T eyes $5 billion order from air force’s combat aircraft deal
  •  
     
    Comments (1)  Print
     
     
    #1 Author: avatar_singh (20 November 2007 12:35)
     
    this article,though for american establishment, suits very much the attitude (treacherous) of a RAT CALLED MANMOHAN SINGH WHO SHOUDL HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED LONG TIME AGO FROM OUR SCENCE FOR HAVING SOLD INDIA TO AMERICAN AGENDA WAY BACK 15YRS AGO-
    a great misconception is that so caled liberalization and globalization was brought to india by this manmohan singh. In fact soon after victory in iraq war in febraury 1991 the bush no. first declared a new world order in which he explicitly said that he will open up the world for american business. In fact his trade seccratary immeditealy annomnuced that she will make sure that america open up the thighs of thrid world countries as a slwoly and surely to american business(true analogy to a rape)-that was given the name liberalization and globalization for which the british and americans had been working since 1986. What was left for america to do was install maleable stooges inside the thrirld world countries. escpeally those types who are unelctable and have no mass base of their own-- in other words who are not elelctable democratically but installed from above through media and other manipulations.
    this manmohan singh in india fulffiled that criteria of being unliked and unelctable insignificant person who was willing to act on arder of his american masters

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/higgs/higgs68.html

    THIS ARTICLE FOR THOSE IDIOT INDIANS WHO THINK THAT TEHCNOCRAT OR MANAGERS SHOULD RUN THE COUNTRY. THEY KNOW BUT TRY TO HIDE THAT THE WHOLE ACTS OF THE TRAITORS LIKE MANMOHAN SINGH HAS BEEN A SOLE AGENDA OF BRINGING INDIA ON A PLATTER TO HIS ANGLOSAXON MASTERS.

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/higgs/higgs68.html


    Crackpot Realism Is Riding High

    by Robert Higgs
    by Robert Higgs



    Mills's key insight was that although such people have indeed been movers and shakers, they have moved and shaken within such a constricted milieu of experience and training that in most respects they are fools. Despite having developed supreme confidence in their own judgment and a corresponding contempt for other people's views, they are astonishingly ignorant of many workaday aspects of the world and bewildered in the face of unexpected difficulties. As government leaders responsible for matters of war and peace, they have a tendency to paint themselves into corners of their own
     
     
    Quote    
     
     
    Add comments
       
     

     

    Fair Use Notice This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material is being made available in an effort to advance understanding arms trade activities, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html This is a completely non-commercial site for private personal use. No fee is charged, and no money is made off of the operation of this site - we have limited ads to cover our operational cost we don't have a donation button neither we accept any. All material that is not produced by the individuals who use this site will be placed under the directory /fair-use or /media under this domain.