WHEN AMERICANS SELL WHOLE LOADS OF PLANES TO PAKSITAN AND THEN INDIANS PIMP FOR BUYING THE SAME PLANES FROM AMERICA -THEN WHY WOULD RUSSIA NOT PROFIT FROM SELLING PLANES TO PAKSITAN THREOUGH CHINA?-AFTERALL FOR DECADES RUSSIA NEVER SOLD TO PAKSITAN WHILE AMERICA HAS AWLAYS LOADED PKAISTAN AGASINT INDIA.
INIDA WILL SHOULD KNOW THE COST OF TAKING FRIENDS FOR GRANTED.
THE ONE REASON INDIANS EXPECT MORE FROM RUSSIAN IS SIMPLY BECAUSE RUSSIAN HAVE NOT KICKED INDIANS ARSE WHILE INDIANS LIEK TO RESPECT ONLY THOSE PEOPLE-BRIITSH AND AMERICANS WHO HAVE ABUSED THE INDIANS WHOLE THROUGH HISTORY AND KICK THEIR AASS ALL THE TIME-EVEN DENYING THEM SEAT IN un AS RECETNLY AS LAST YEAR.

in another context president putin might have been saying about manmoahn singhs and jaswant sings of india-scavanging jackels on foreing embassy direction.

http://www.russiatoday.ru/election/news/17320

quote--"Putin warns against `scavenging jackals`
President Putin has warned against attempts to restore the influence of the oligarchs in Russia. He told thousands of supporters in Moscow that the power-hungry tycoons had not gone away. He said they remained in the wings, waiting for an opportunity to regain their influence in Russ"""

"“Unfortunately there are people in our country who are scavenging like jackals at foreign embassies, hoping to receive support from foreign funds and governments rather than the support of their own people,” he said, adding that this won’t last long:
"
als we donto have putins amonst us-only yeltsin like traityors swariming all over india.and no body is taking them out to save india from onrushing slavery !!


it should be eye opener(though it will not) for those idiotic indians-more like knowiningly doing treachery than being foolish) who think america wil fight the muslim extremism for india.


http://www.larouchepac.com/news/2007/11/20/u-s-ambassador-plays-mullah-card-destabilization-pakistan.html

U.S. Ambassador Plays a `Mullah Card' in Destabilization of Pakistan

November 20, 2007

quote-"ndicating once again that the Cheney-led neo-cons of Washington are solely interested in enhancing unrest in Pakistan, the U.S. Ambassador to Islamabad, Anne Patterson, met Maulana Fazlur Rehman, chief of Jamiat-Ulema-Islami (JUI-F) and an often-used British asset in Pakistan. U.S. Embassy spokesman Elizabeth Colton told AFP that Patterson and Rehman discussed a number of issues, including the importance of lifting the emergency. Needless to say, Maulana Fazlur has publicly stated that he wants to see the state of emergency lifted before free and fair elections are held.

But Maulana Fazlur Rahman is known for his contribution to developing the core members of the Taliban movement through his multitude of madrassahs, or Islamic seminaries. His is one of the most influential and resourceful organizations in Pakistan working for what is described as a "pure, Islamic state." "

so some indian pimps working for america are pushing for old kitty hwak-what bnext? thse bastards know that their mother have nio value otherwise they would have sold her as well.
#
BA system must be banned from india-itis a n enemy organisation as far as india is concerend.


british are the number one enmy of india and of the rest of the world.


see this--


http://www.antiwar.com/orig/lohdi.php?articleid=12019

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/lohdi.php?articleid=12019

quote--"
December 8, 2007
Britain's Neo-Imperial Dreams in Afghanistan
by Bahlol Lohdi

Dean Acheson, the distinguished American statesman, famously opined in a speech at West Point in 1962, "that Great Britain has lost an empire and has not yet found a role." Forty years later, in 2002, Tony Blair and fellow dreamers thought the tragedy of 9/11 provided them with the opportunity once again to play a determining role on the world stage. The notion that Britain was to America as Greece had been to Rome – implying that Britain was going to be the "brain" and America the "brawn" – became a fashionable topic of discourse in the British media.

No matter how deluded this may have been when viewed objectively, Blair and his acolytes clung to the idea. They hoped to use the Anglo-American "special relationship" as the vehicle for achieving Britain's neo-imperial dreams.

However, the United States continued to view the relationship differently, and Blair's efforts to shape American policy through close ties to Washington failed, as has now been revealed by numerous retired senior British officials.

Nevertheless, still hoping to gain a place at the top table of decision making, and thereby try and shape future events, Blair committed Britain's forces to fight battles in two countries where Britain had a colonial past: Afghanistan and Iraq.

London thought that its colonial era experience in both countries would enable it to claim superior knowledge and expertise, thus giving British policy proposals inordinate weight, thereby influencing the political and economic shape of the post-conflict era in both countries to British advantage. However, this ambition has already been thwarted in Iraq and is at the point of being thwarted in Afghanistan.-------"