Make HomePage BookMark Us
 
Login
Name :  
Passwrd :  
   
   
Register Now!
Forgot Your Pass?
www.idrw.org / Indian Defense Research Wing » India » Army denies sabotage of Arjun trial
Menu
India Europe
Asia&Pacific N&S America
Africa Contact Us
Exclusive RSS 2.0
 
Advanced Search
Calender
«    April 2008    »
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 
Latest News
» After hiccups, indigenous Light Combat Helicopter set t ...
» Agni-V to be ready by 2010
» Gorshkov launched in water for trials, delivery by 2011 ...
» Light Combat Aircraft to be delivered by 2011: Antony
» Russian aircraft carrier ready in 2012 if India pays $2 ...
» Saab Challenge: Gaining Traction for Gripen NG
» IAF to launch its satellite: Air Chief
» Xianglong UAV copy of Global Hawk? Developed By China
» Navy’s sub induction plan suffers blow
» Indian warship fights off pirates in Gulf of Aden
Poll
Should Kaveri engine project be scrapped ??

Yes
NO
Go for a Joint venture on Kaveri
Go for a Joint venture on new Engine
Archives
November 2008 (41)
October 2008 (51)
September 2008 (53)
August 2008 (83)
July 2008 (82)
June 2008 (98)
May 2008 (79)
April 2008 (111)
March 2008 (65)
February 2008 (133)
January 2008 (103)
December 2007 (86)
November 2007 (82)
October 2007 (130)
September 2007 (122)
August 2007 (136)
July 2007 (102)
June 2007 (90)
May 2007 (135)
April 2007 (89)
Change Skin
Sponsors
 
 

India : Army denies sabotage of Arjun trial
 
BY : IANS

Army denies sabotage of Arjun trial


The Indian Army Monday refuted allegations of “sabotage” in the trials of the indigenously developed main battle tank (MBT) Arjun, saying that any speculation regarding this was “misconceived.”

“During the winter trials of the Arjun tank, the DRDO's (Defence Research and Development Organisation) involvement was complete and of the same extent as the user's (Indian Army).

Hence, any speculation of sabotage is totally uncalled for and baseless,” an army official told IANS.
Fourteen Arjun tanks were handed over to the Indian Army for user trials last May but were returned to the manufacturer - the Combat Vehicles Development Establishment - with a list of defects. These were handed back to the army in December for the winter trials that were conducted in the deserts of Rajasthan.

The army had told a key parliamentary panel earlier this month that the Arjun tank, which has been in development for nearly 36 years, failed to deliver at the winter trials. The army said a number of improvements still needed to be carried out.

Last Thursday, Minister of State for Defence Production Rao Inderjit Singh had hinted at the possibility of “sabotage” during the winter trials. Indian Army chief Gen. Deepak Kapoor then visited the production unit to inspect the tanks. “The possibility of sabotage needs to be examined,” Singh maintained.

“The engines fitted in the tanks were German and were performing well for the past 15 years. I wonder what has happened to them overnight,” Singh said, talking about the reported failures of the tank.

Clarifying the issue, the army official who spoke to IANS said: “Despite the removal of a large number of defects at the joint receipt inspection (JRI) stage, duly assisted by the Indian Army, major assemblies of the two tanks failed in the winter trials.”

The major assemblies included four power packs of German origin and one indigenous gun.

The army has also pointed to the tank's deficient fire control system, inaccuracy of its guns, low speeds in tactical areas - principally the desert - and its inability to operate in temperatures over 50 degrees Celsius.

The army had laid down its qualitative requirement (QR) for the Arjun in 1972. In 1982, it was announced that the prototype was ready for field trials. However, the tank was publicly unveiled for the first time only in 1995.

Arjun was originally meant to be a 40-tonne tank with a 105 mm gun. It has now grown to a 50-tonne tank with a 120 mm gun.

The tank was meant to supplement and eventually replace the Soviet-era T-72 MBT that was first inducted in the early 1980s.

However, delays in the Arjun project, and Pakistan's decision to purchase the T-80 from Ukraine, prompted India to order 310 T-90s, an upgraded version of the T-72, in 2001.

Of these, 186 were assembled from kits at the Heavy Vehicles Factory at Avadi. An agreement was also signed for the licensed production of another 1,000 T-90s.

With the development of the Arjun delayed further, India last year signed a fresh contract with Russia to buy another 330 T-90s.
 
 
 
   
 
 
Dear Visitor You have Not Logged In Please Register And Then Login.
 
 
  • 'Possibility of sabotaging Arjun tanks cannot be ruled out'
  • Sabotage suspected in Arjun tank engine; black box installed
  • Indian Army rejects joint assessment of indigenous main battle tank
  • Indian Army seeks next generation battle tank
  • Indian Army to receive 124 Arjun tanks by 2009
  •  
     
    Comments (2)  Print
     
     
    #1 Author: putre47 (3 May 2008 21:04)
     
    Kapoor and his predecessor JJ Singh have on separate occasions expressed their unhappiness with the tank.

    "What we have today is a mid-level technology. What we need is a tank of international quality," Kapoor said in November.

    JJ Singh had spoken in much the same vein during a major Indian Army exercise in the deserts of Rajasthan in April-May 2007.

    However, the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) has defended the Arjun tank.

    "Arjun is a proven tank. The defects are pertaining to quality control and production of the tank which can always be fine tuned," a senior DRDO official said.

    Are the Indian Generals on the take (taking bribes from the Russians?) can they come out and defend their earlier statements??
     
     
    Quote    
     
     
    #2 Author: Don (26 May 2008 19:00)
     
    I am not aware of Arjun tank being tested in cold weather before. So, if this tank is being tested in cold weather for the first time, obviously problems will pop-up. Simple things like wrong oil or the wrong grease being used on this tank could cause great problems. I am not surprise that problems occurred on this trial.

    However, I am not satisfied with the arjun suspension. On youtube, I saw a video of it traversing a bumpy test course, and it looked like Pamela Anderson (big breasted actress) running down a road. Arjun just seems to bound around too much. The suspension needs stiffening up in my opinion. Is the maker doing anything about this suspension problem?
     
     
    Quote    
     
     
    Add comments
       
     

     

    Fair Use Notice This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material is being made available in an effort to advance understanding arms trade activities, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html This is a completely non-commercial site for private personal use. No fee is charged, and no money is made off of the operation of this site - we have limited ads to cover our operational cost we don't have a donation button neither we accept any. All material that is not produced by the individuals who use this site will be placed under the directory /fair-use or /media under this domain.