Make HomePage BookMark Us
 
Login
Name :  
Passwrd :  
   
   
Register Now!
Forgot Your Pass?
www.idrw.org / Indian Defense Research Wing » India » Cracks in India's missile shield
Menu
India Europe
Asia&Pacific N&S America
Africa Contact Us
Exclusive RSS 2.0
 
Advanced Search
Calender
«    June 2008    »
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 
Latest News
» Indian Navy to buy 37 anti-submarine helicopters
» Gripen Ng and Tejas combo?
» India`s future tank nowhere in sight
» Raptor Thrills at Farnborough but Thanks to Escort?
» Engine's Delayed Delivery Clouds Indian Trainer
» India turns to Israel & Italy
» Opinion: Gripen hard to beat in Indian MMRCA contest
» HAL gets Rs2,400 cr IAF deal to upgrade Jaguar fighter ...
» Russia 'could answer U.S. shield with orbital ballisti ...
» India sets in motion plans for futuristic tanks
Poll
Should Kaveri engine project be scrapped ??

Yes
NO
Go for a Joint venture on Kaveri
Go for a Joint venture on new Engine
Archives
August 2008 (64)
July 2008 (82)
June 2008 (98)
May 2008 (79)
April 2008 (111)
March 2008 (65)
February 2008 (133)
January 2008 (103)
December 2007 (86)
November 2007 (82)
October 2007 (130)
September 2007 (122)
August 2007 (136)
July 2007 (102)
June 2007 (90)
May 2007 (135)
April 2007 (89)
Change Skin
Sponsors
 
 

India : Cracks in India's missile shield
 
BY : TIMESNOW



The government is known to boast about India's might, but on closer observation one will notice that it is all a veil of deception. India's biggest warships are using defunct missile systems and are not at all ready for battle.

TIMES NOW has gained access to a defence ministry report that reveals that at least four missile systems are malfuctioning.

The warships, which are the pride of the Indian Navy, used to guard thousands of kilometers of India's coastline could find themselves sitting ducks in a battle situation. A Defecne ministry report shows A Defence Ministry report shows that missiles on these ships are not in working condition, putting our coastline in clear and present danger.

India's warships are equipped with various anti ship missiles ranging from the Uran, Klub and others.

The Uran , which is an anti-ship missile is deployed on some of India's biggest warships like the INS Mysore. The missile in question may have a range of about hundred kilometres, but it cannot be relied upon. Its fire control system is faulty.

The Klub, another anti ship missile with a range of 220 km is fitted on the INS Talwar and the INS Trishul. But this missile too does not perform to its specifications.

The anti aircraft missile Shtil used on the Talwar Class frigates has proved unreliable and inconsistent. In fact former Naval chief. Admiral Madhvendra Singh had refused to take delivery of the Shtil.

Even the Harrier aircraft on the INS Viraat have a lot to complain about. The Sea Eagle missile used by the Harriers do not work well. What makes things worse is the fact that the plant that produced these missiles has been shut down.

The fact that India's battleships are not battle worthy due to their lack of defences is worrysome and leaves a big crack in India's naval defence. That Indian navy is woefully short of firepower and this fact has been brought to the notice of Defence Minister A K Antony and top officers of the armed forces.

When quizzed about the Indian Navy's woeful situation, Defence Minister AK Antony said, "See whenever we import certain things from outside, naturally out of these large imports some portion is sometimes defective. That is why I have repeatedly said don't depend always on foreign suppliers."

Indian Navy is in dire need of an upgrade and the problem is urgent. China has already boosted its presence in the Indian Ocean and the Pakistani threat cannot be ingnored. But with its key missile not fighting fit, kinks are showing up in India's naval armour.

Naval sources confirm TIMES NOW's report on faulty missiles

Sources have revealed that the Uran missile system has been facing problems, which are yet to be rectified. TIMES NOW has now got reactions from a Naval spokesperson on the issue. According to the spokesperson, the reports on the defunct missiles are indeed true and the necessary steps are being taken to rectify the issue.

Here are the spokespersons reactions when questioned about the issue.

On the Uran:
"There have been some amount of problems with the Uran. We want them to be rectified and they are being rectified."

On the KLUB Missile System being defective:
"There were problems with some versions of the klub but all klubs are not problematic."

On the Sea Eagle missile system:
"The sea eagle fired from the harrier has had problems. We are phasing out the missile"

On the Sh-thil missile system:
"While every problem is worrisome, the shtil is not a bad missile"
 
 
 
   
 
 
Dear Visitor You have Not Logged In Please Register And Then Login.
 
 
  • No dealings on aircrafts with Russia: Indian Navy
  • Navy warships sitting ducks at sea
  • India refuses upgraded submarines from Russia: Report
  • Navy tests new missile off Goa
  • Barak good, no shortage, says Navy chief Mehta
  •  
     
    Comments (2)  Print
     
     
    #1 Author: Sumku (29 June 2008 15:53)
     
    Crap. First I need answers to below questions

    Critical Question
    How many missiles were checked and how many were defective out of it?

    Very Important Question
    The missile that has been checked and found to be defective, was it ever checked earlier also and was it faulty then

    Another Important Question
    When was the last time that the audit was done. Now in the previous audit some missiles would have been cleared. Were these missiles checked in this audit.Whats the status of the missiles which were cleared the last time?

    On what basis was the sample chosen?

    Each single missile must have been tested on various parameters, some of the parameters would have been critical and some not so critical.
    Now a missile that has been termed as defective, on exactly how many critical parameters did it fail?

    Unless I get to know the results of these, I would take it as a problem with Inventory stock and normal wear and tear with media exaggerating the report.

    Frankly, I have a serious problem with this so called anonymous reporting done by the media on the pretext of protecting source.
    As per Times Now, they somehow gained access to some report. Now Times Now has not specified which report, the report of Audits done by IN which routinely gets submitted to CAG anyways or some other report.

    Now, If Times Now actually has taken pains to gain access to a so called report then why not publish it in full. Afterall you claim to be the fourth pillar of democracy then why not publish it.

    Times Now took so much pains to gain access to a report to do what? Publish gist of that report? It it were me, I would publish the full report but Times Now has choosen not to do so.Why?
     
     
    Quote    
     
     
    #2 Author: avatar_singh (25 July 2008 12:51)
     
    [/u]american nulcear plant designs falult and unsafe[u]

    yes do away with all restrictive clauses which demands that american hardware works rather than be stored in somewhere in India. what a harami traitor THESE iNDIANS kuttas are.SUCH AS THE LIKES OF HARAMI MANMOHAN SINGH AND HIS TREACHEROUS GANG IN PERESS AND BUSINESS COMMUNITY.

    NEWS FGLASH--THE AMERICAN NULCEAR DESIGNS DO NTO WORK ACCORDING TO AMERICAN NULCEAR WATCHDOG.
    (SO WHY NOT SHIFT THAT TO TRAITORS INDIANS ACCOUNT?).

    http://www.counterpunch.org/ July 25, 2008

    Nuclear Regulatory Commission Deals Devastating Blow to Nuclear Power Industry
    New Nukes Not Ready for Prime Time

    By HARVEY WASSERMAN

    A devastating blow to the much-hyped revival of atomic power has been delivered by an unlikely source---the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The NRC says the "standardized" designs on which the entire premise of returning nuclear power to center stage is based have massive holes in them, and may not be ready for approval for years to come.

    Delivered by one of America's most notoriously docile agencies, the NRC's warning essentially says: that all cost estimates for new nuclear reactors---and all licensing and construction schedules---are completely up for grabs, and have no reliable basis in fact. Thus any comparisons between future atomic reactors and renewable technologies are moot at best. And any "hard number" basis for independent financing for future nukes may not be available for years to come, if ever.
     
     
    Quote    
     
     
    Add comments
       
     

     

    Fair Use Notice This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material is being made available in an effort to advance understanding arms trade activities, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html This is a completely non-commercial site for private personal use. No fee is charged, and no money is made off of the operation of this site - we have limited ads to cover our operational cost we don't have a donation button neither we accept any. All material that is not produced by the individuals who use this site will be placed under the directory /fair-use or /media under this domain.