Make HomePage BookMark Us
 
Login
Name :  
Passwrd :  
   
   
Register Now!
Forgot Your Pass?
www.idrw.org / Indian Defense Research Wing » Europe » Navy signs deal to build biggest ever UK super-carriers
Menu
India Europe
Asia&Pacific N&S America
Africa Contact Us
Exclusive RSS 2.0
 
Advanced Search
Calender
«    July 2008    »
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 
Latest News
» After hiccups, indigenous Light Combat Helicopter set t ...
» Agni-V to be ready by 2010
» Gorshkov launched in water for trials, delivery by 2011 ...
» Light Combat Aircraft to be delivered by 2011: Antony
» Russian aircraft carrier ready in 2012 if India pays $2 ...
» Saab Challenge: Gaining Traction for Gripen NG
» IAF to launch its satellite: Air Chief
» Xianglong UAV copy of Global Hawk? Developed By China
» Navy’s sub induction plan suffers blow
» Indian warship fights off pirates in Gulf of Aden
Poll
Should Kaveri engine project be scrapped ??

Yes
NO
Go for a Joint venture on Kaveri
Go for a Joint venture on new Engine
Archives
November 2008 (41)
October 2008 (51)
September 2008 (53)
August 2008 (83)
July 2008 (82)
June 2008 (98)
May 2008 (79)
April 2008 (111)
March 2008 (65)
February 2008 (133)
January 2008 (103)
December 2007 (86)
November 2007 (82)
October 2007 (130)
September 2007 (122)
August 2007 (136)
July 2007 (102)
June 2007 (90)
May 2007 (135)
April 2007 (89)
Change Skin
Sponsors
 
 

Europe : Navy signs deal to build biggest ever UK super-carriers
 
BY : Timesonline

Navy signs deal to build biggest ever UK super-carriers


The Royal Navy was promoted into the maritime superleague yesterday when ministers signed the long-awaited contract for two 65,000-tonne aircraft carriers.

They will be the second biggest of their kind in the world, each the size of the QE2. Only the American Nimitz Class aircraft carriers, at 90,000 tonnes, have a more impressive tonnage.

The Ministry of Defence went ahead despite a stretched defence budget and murmurings about the near £4 billion price tag and the wisdom of building such huge warships.

Admiral Sir Jonathon Band, the First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff, said the signing - on board HMS Ark Royal, one of the existing, much smaller carriers - was “a proud moment for the Royal Navy and a proud moment for Britain”. Standing on the flight deck of Ark Royal, moored in Portsmouth dock, Admiral Band said that a navy was defined by its “big-ticket” items such as carriers, amphibious vessels and submarines, “not by minesweepers”.

He insisted that the carriers were not just for the Navy but would benefit all the Armed Forces, and all his fellow Service chiefs had agreed that the two warships were necessary, despite the cost. “We’re as one,” he said.

Andrew Brookes, of the International Institute for Strategic Studies, cast doubt on the carrier project, saying that the concept of expeditionary warfare upon which the programme was based was out of date. “I can’t see a prime minister sending a carrier off on some expeditionary operation,” he said. “We should reevaluate the whole idea. The French did and they have decided that rather than have two carriers, they should focus more on acquiring landing rights in the Indian Ocean.

“Of course we don’t know what the future holds but I can see far more use for additional frigates and transport aircraft and helicopters in the years ahead than two giant carriers.”

In an apparent sign of a tacit deal between Service chiefs, Admiral Band said that he had given his personal support to the Army’s demand for a new generation of armoured vehicles, which will cost about £14 billion.

The RAF, which wants more Eurofighter Typhoons and a Super Lynx helicopter, also has his support.

The MoD is carrying out a comprehensive review of all medium and long-term equipment programmes. The only exception is the carriers, which are now sacrosanct.

To keep within the budget limits, cuts and delays in other projects are now seen as inevitable, opening the way for some bitter in-fighting between the Services. With yesterday’s signing ceremony, the Government agreed with the Navy that when it comes to carriers, size matters. Admiral Band said that jumping from the 20,000-tonne Invincible Class carriers, such as HMS Ark Royal, to the giant 65,000-tonne warships would provide greater flexibility and power-projection capability.

Baroness Taylor of Bolton, the Minister for Defence Equipment and Support, signed for the MoD and Alan Johnston, chief executive officer of the newly formed BVT Surface Fleet company, a joint venture combining BAE Systems and the VT Group, added his signature to the contract.

The press release issued for the occasion referred to the “£3 billion” contract, but Lady Taylor acknowledged later that the total cost, taking into account inflation estimates and other risk factors, was actually £3.9 billion. The two carriers, to be named HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales, will come into service in 2014 and 2016 respectively.

Lady Taylor admitted there had been doubts in the minds of some people that the programme would ever come to fruition. She said it had taken ten years from the original concept, announced in the 1998 Strategic Defence Review, to put in place the industrial structure to build the huge warships. Asked about the cost and whether it was justified, Admiral Band said that although the present focus was on two land campaigns - Iraq and Afghanistan - it was vital to invest in the future, 15 or 20 years ahead, and he envisaged carriers playing a crucial role in projecting power and protecting Britain’s global interests.

The ships will be built at Barrow-in-Furness, Portsmouth, Govan in Glasgow and Rosyth in Fife, creating 10,000 jobs at the peak of the programme in about 2011.

Mr Johnston said that the vessels would be built in huge blocks and then taken by barge to Rosyth, where they would be assembled.

He said he was confident that they would be built “on time and at cost”. Lady Taylor said that there were incentives for BVT to construct the ships for less than the £3.9 billion price, and she did not envisage that the programme would go over this figure.

As well as the £3.9 billion, another £12 billion will be spent on providing the ships with Joint Strike Fighters - 36 on each. These are being developed in a joint Anglo-American programme, although it is so delayed that Queen Elizabethwill have to come into service equipped with the older-generation Harrier GR9 jump-jet aircraft.
 
 
 
   
 
 
Dear Visitor You have Not Logged In Please Register And Then Login.
 
 
  • Indian Navy to position men on French aircraft carrier
  • Typhoon may fly from carriers
  • Indian Navy To Order Another Aircraft Carrier
  • RUSSIAN ADMIRAL ANNOUNCES AMBITIOUS NAVAL BUILD-UP
  • Next generation frigates
  •  
     
    Comments (2)  Print
     
     
    #1 Author: avatar_singh (19 July 2008 12:50)
     
    http://www.larouchepac.com/node/11008/print

    " The British Plan To Recolonize The Subcontinent Is Gaining Ground
    18 Jul 2008

    This article appeared in the July 18, 2008 edition of Executive Intelligence Review.

    The British Plan To Recolonize The Subcontinent Is Gaining Ground

    by Ramtanu Maitra

    The massive suicide bomb attack on July 7, which killed 41 people at the Indian Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, including the Indian military attaché and counselor, indicates the ruthlessness of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI)-British MI6-aided Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), or Pakistani Taliban, to break up Pakistan, and create a new, and unstable, nation bordering the resource-rich Central Asia and Iran. Although the Western media is keen to blame the “Taliban,” it is clear that the Afghan Taliban was not involved, and that it was the handiwork of the TTP.

    A day earlier, on the first anniversary of the Pakistani Army's raid of Lal Masjid at the heart of Pakistan's capital, Islamabad, a suicide bomber blew himself up, killing at least 19 people, mostly police officers. On the same day the Indian Embassy was attacked, terror struck Pakistan's largest city, Karachi, six times within an hour, as unknown terrorists triggered a series of blasts that wounded over 50 people, including children and policemen. Karachi, the largest Pakistani port, is the main disembarkation station of nearly 70% of the supplies that go to Afghanistan by road to the battling U.S./NATO troops. The supplies pass through the famed Khyber Pass--a 30-mile stretch between the Khyber Hills. At the time of this writing, the Khyber Pass, and a part of Peshawar city, 22 miles east of the Pass, remains infested with militant local tribes working hand-in-glove with the TTP.

    The only way to comprehend what is happening is to first step back, and look at the key geostrategic puppet-master in the region: the British Empire.
     
     
    Quote    
     
     
    #2 Author: avatar_singh (25 July 2008 12:54)
     
    ANGLOAMERICAN FRAUD


    http://www.larouchepac.com/news/2008/07/24/report-how-british-invented-shore-tax-havens.html


    Report: How the British Invented Off-Shore Tax Havens
    Increase Decrease

    July 24, 2008 (LPAC) This morning, Jack Blum, a lawyer with long experience in investigating money laundering, tax evasion, and similar financial crimes, provided a useful assessment when he told the Senate Finance Committee that offshore tax havens, such as those that are scattered about the British Commonwealth, have their origins in something called the "revenue rule," a common law rule that says that no government should help enforce the tax laws of other governments. This "revenue rule," Blum said, has its origins in English common law during the Napoleonic era, when English courts upheld contracts between private parties that were intended to evade French customs duties. Since the revenue rule has expanded to become a basic principle of common law, one result has been that the IRS cannot enforce tax judgments against individuals or corporations if the money at issue is being held in an offshore bank.

    The revenue rule has spawned an entire industry dedicated to helping people evade taxes in their own countries, mostly in the infamous British Commonwealth offshore financial centers such as the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands, among others. Offshore banks actually sell services in the US and other countries to help people evade taxes they would otherwise have to pay their own governments. This is not unlike the British approach to terrorism, in that terrorists living in London are protected as long as they attack other countries.

    Blum proposed a number of measures to deal with the problem, mostly having to do with requiring taxpayers to prove that their offshore companies are, indeed, real, rather than the shell companies usually set up to hide assets. However, Blum agreed with Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) when he said that without getting agreement with other countries to combat the problem, "it's just going to stay a game." Blum replied that "the revenue rule has to be taken down as an international principle."

     
     
    Quote    
     
     
    Add comments
       
     

     

    Fair Use Notice This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material is being made available in an effort to advance understanding arms trade activities, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html This is a completely non-commercial site for private personal use. No fee is charged, and no money is made off of the operation of this site - we have limited ads to cover our operational cost we don't have a donation button neither we accept any. All material that is not produced by the individuals who use this site will be placed under the directory /fair-use or /media under this domain.