Make HomePage BookMark Us
 
Login
Name :  
Passwrd :  
   
   
Register Now!
Forgot Your Pass?
www.idrw.org / Indian Defense Research Wing » India » India`s future tank nowhere in sight
Menu
India Europe
Asia&Pacific N&S America
Africa Contact Us
Exclusive RSS 2.0
 
Advanced Search
Calender
«    July 2008    »
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 
Latest News
» After hiccups, indigenous Light Combat Helicopter set t ...
» Agni-V to be ready by 2010
» Gorshkov launched in water for trials, delivery by 2011 ...
» Light Combat Aircraft to be delivered by 2011: Antony
» Russian aircraft carrier ready in 2012 if India pays $2 ...
» Saab Challenge: Gaining Traction for Gripen NG
» IAF to launch its satellite: Air Chief
» Xianglong UAV copy of Global Hawk? Developed By China
» Navy’s sub induction plan suffers blow
» Indian warship fights off pirates in Gulf of Aden
Poll
Should Kaveri engine project be scrapped ??

Yes
NO
Go for a Joint venture on Kaveri
Go for a Joint venture on new Engine
Archives
November 2008 (41)
October 2008 (51)
September 2008 (53)
August 2008 (83)
July 2008 (82)
June 2008 (98)
May 2008 (79)
April 2008 (111)
March 2008 (65)
February 2008 (133)
January 2008 (103)
December 2007 (86)
November 2007 (82)
October 2007 (130)
September 2007 (122)
August 2007 (136)
July 2007 (102)
June 2007 (90)
May 2007 (135)
April 2007 (89)
Change Skin
Sponsors
 
 

India : India`s future tank nowhere in sight
 
BY : Ajai Shukla


On July 22 and 23, tank experts from across the world gathered in Delhi to advise the Army on designing its next generation of armoured vehicles — the Future Main Battle Tank (FMBT) and Future Infantry Combat Vehicle (FICV).

Despite two years of labour, the Army’s tank managers, the Directorate General of Mechanised Forces (DGMF), have been unable to decide on a suitable design.

Several of these experts told Business Standard that the DGMF’s problems stem from its decision to start designing a tank all over again. Instead of building on two decades of experience in designing the indigenous Arjun tank, by moving onto an advanced version of the Arjun, the Army is going back to the start line.

Experts at the seminar — including Israeli tank legend, Maj Gen Yossi Ben-Hanan, who designed that country’s successful Merkava tank — pointed out that tank design is evolutionary, each design building upon the previous one.

The Israelis began designing their Merkava-1 MBT in 1970; today they have the world-class Merkava-4. The Russians started in 1940 with the T-32 tank; that experience led to the T-55; the T-72 followed, which was further refined to today’s T-90.

India has rejected this well-tested path. The Combat Vehicles R&D Establishment (CVRDE) in Chennai, which has designed the Arjun, is now offering an improved Arjun-2 with more modern electronics. But last month, the Army’s top tank-man, Lt Gen D Bhardwaj, trashed two decades of indigenous design work on the Arjun; he declared that the Army would buy just 124 Arjuns for its 4,000-tank fleet. On July 23, Maj Gen Yossi Ben-Hanan warned the audience, “A decision taken today to build an Indian tank will yield an MBT only 15 years hence.”

And for those 15 years, Russia is poised to fill the Indian inventory, just as it has for the last 35 years. It is learned that Moscow has seriously violated the 2001 contract to supply India with 310 Russian-built T-90s and then transfer the technology, materials and components to build another 1,000 in India.

Seven years after that contract was signed, not a single T-90 has rolled out of Heavy Vehicles Factory (HVF), Avadi, where they are to be built. Senior MoD sources tell that Russia has failed to provide India with critical technologies and components needed for T-90 manufacture.

Russia has not been sued for this breach of contract; instead it has been rewarded. Last December, India ordered 347 more fully-built T-90s. A senior MoD officer dealing directly with purchases points out that this will delay the indigenous manufacture of T-90s even further, since the Russian plant cannot transfer any components or materials until it meets the fresh Indian order.

Meanwhile, the 310 T-90s, which have been delivered by Russia and introduced into service, are not battle worthy. The crucial Fire Control System (FCS), through which the tank fires at the enemy, has failed to function in Indian summers. An obliging Russian industry offered to sell India “tank air conditioners”, though no other tank in our inventory needs or uses air-conditioning.

The Russian air-conditioners were put through trials, during which the tank driver fainted from heatstroke. Now the MoD has floated a global tender for air-conditioning the T-90s.
 
 
 
   
 
 
Dear Visitor You have Not Logged In Please Register And Then Login.
 
 
  • No more Arjuns for Indian Army
  • Arjun tank's comparative trials called off
  • India, Russia plan to build futuristic MBT
  • Induct 500 Arjuns: DRDO
  • Will Arjun stand the desert test?
  •  
     
    Comments (3)  Print
     
     
    #1 Author: OneSanakyan (27 July 2008 22:49)
     
    Lt. Gen Bhaardwaj has become the spokesman for the Ruskies. He seems to have the last say as to which tank the Indian Army should have. Is his position higher than that of the Defence Minister or even that of the PM?

    High time this bastard traitor is court-marshalled and dismissed in disgrace. That would be a lesson to all those lackeys in the pay of foreigners who are against the induction of indegenous products.

    So long as India has these elements in its Armed Forces, it does not need Pakis and Chinkis to make India the laughing stock among the international community.
     
     
    Quote    
     
     
    #2 Author: Ram Singh (28 July 2008 01:39)
     
    you are rignht he is a real arse hole bastard
     
     
    Quote    
     
     
    #3 Author: B.Chatterjee (28 July 2008 02:02)
     
    Start producing Arjuna-II @124 tanks a year (2 regiments)
    Continue for next 9 years plus and produce at least 20 regiments
    which is 1240 tanks
    T-90 has been a failure like Groshkov. Brahmos has been a big success like SU30mki. Each
    Russian-Indian joint venture may not be a failure and may not be a success. It is 75 % success and 25% failure.
    War machines should be present in sufficient numbers and with huge reserve & license to manufacture each part any time & every time. The serial production should be a continious process. Look for at least 4 types of Self propelled artillery like BAE-AS90, German 155mmFZH, French Nexter, SA G6 and also G5. Manufacture 1240 of each and have 4000 to 5000 plus self propelled artillery in next 10 years along with upgraded T72/ T55/ Vijayanta/ T90 and Arjuna-2 making a size of 4000 plus. 10 yeasr sufficient to design a futuristic MBT and start making it from 2019. Pranab Mukherjee wasted 3 years and made our dfefence weaker and vulnerable.
     
     
    Quote    
     
     
    Add comments
       
     

     

    Fair Use Notice This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material is being made available in an effort to advance understanding arms trade activities, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html This is a completely non-commercial site for private personal use. No fee is charged, and no money is made off of the operation of this site - we have limited ads to cover our operational cost we don't have a donation button neither we accept any. All material that is not produced by the individuals who use this site will be placed under the directory /fair-use or /media under this domain.